StopTheMyths

sal wrote: ↑

Thu May 05, 2022 6:44 pm

.*☆✬ 𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚎 ✬☆*.
@JustEmbarking
·
47m
Weird watching Francis here defending
@SandraFelgas
who has lied about the BKA finding fibre's from Madeleine's pyjamas in CB's van .... Especially considering he pretends to care about the grieving #McCann family. Her actions are disgusting no matter what side your on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone point out the link to SF specifically stating fibres/pyjamas?

According to the German press it was........

British media speculated that these traces could be fibers from "Maddie's" pajamas

Not once Sandra Felgueiras uses the word fibres or anything similar in the documentary. I'll translate that. She might not be the source for the Tabloids who started all this at all. If we read those two first articles that appeared, both on The Sun and Daily Mail, they mention "rumours". Rumours are unsourced. So, either it was a fabrication by the those two English tabloids, which wouldn't surprise me, or they misunderstood or didn't even bother to have the Sandra Felgueira's documentary fully translated.


I also disagree in using an old story about Sandra's mother to attack her credibility as a journalist. We should never attack the messenger but the message.

sal wrote: ↑

Fri May 06, 2022 1:35 pm

sal wrote: ↑

Thu May 05, 2022 6:44 pm

.*☆✬ 𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚎 ✬☆*.
@JustEmbarking
·
47m
Weird watching Francis here defending
@SandraFelgas
who has lied about the BKA finding fibre's from Madeleine's pyjamas in CB's van .... Especially considering he pretends to care about the grieving #McCann family. Her actions are disgusting no matter what side your on
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone point out the link to SF specifically stating fibres/pyjamas?

According to the German press it was........

British media speculated that these traces could be fibers from "Maddie's" pajamas

Thanks to J. Morais

Not once Sandra Felgueiras uses the word fibres or anything similar in the documentary. I'll translate that. She might not be the source for the Tabloids who started all this at all. If we read those two first articles that appeared, both on The Sun and Daily Mail, they mention "rumours". Rumours are unsourced. So, either it was a fabrication by the those two English tabloids, which wouldn't surprise me, or they misunderstood or didn't even bother to have the Sandra Felgueira's documentary fully translated.


I also disagree in using an old story about Sandra's mother to attack her credibility as a journalist. We should never attack the messenger but the message.

And (for once!) genuine thanks to Joana, too.

That's insight.

From unnamed traces to the specificity of Madeleine's pyjama fibres in the van, it's a hell of a misunderstanding. I think it was a fabrication by the English tabloids.
Now Fülscher attributing this to Sandra Felgueiras and McFadden waving a campaign against her could make them both liable for defamation.

jjbd wrote: ↑

Wed May 04, 2022 9:42 pm

by Tony Bennett Today at 14:21REPLY:

Herr Wolters is 100% FAKE. And a LIAR.

So are the media, on just about every issue of the day: Climate change, CO2, Brexit, Covid19, the coming New World Order, digital passports, the new mRNA vaccines, the PCR test, China, Trump, Biden, the 2020 'stolen' U.S. election, transgenderism, high-level p.a.e.d.o.philia, Madeleine McCann, evolution, the Bible

lol

by Tony Bennett Today at 11:04
QUESTION: What do we see here?

ANSWER: A lying newspaper owner, a turncoat journalist, and the mainstream media, all working in tandem to produce a major media event, which will be seen by millions, and will help to perpetuate the false narrative that Madeleine McCann was abducted around 10pm on Thursday 3 May 2007.

This game has now been played on the public for over 15 years

The main suspect in the abduction of Madeleine McCann is about to be charged with several separate alleged sexual offences but will not be prosecuted over the British girl’s disappearance in the foreseeable future, according to the German official leading the investigation.

Christian Brückner, a 45-year-old German previously convicted of crimes including rape and sexually molesting children, is suspected of having kidnapped and murdered the three-year-old in the Algarve in 2007.

In the course of a two-year investigation into Brückner, German prosecutors say they have amassed fresh evidence against him and are certain that he killed Madeleine.
Best of Times
We’ll send you our top stories, across all sections, straight to your inbox. Simple as that.
One-click sign up.

He has repeatedly denied any involvement in the case and insists he has an alibi for the evening she vanished from her parents’ holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

However, Hans-Christian Wolters, the senior public prosecutor for the German city of Braunschweig, said his team had not yet found conclusive proof and had no plans “in sight” to prosecute Brückner over the McCann case — contrary to reports that charges would be filed soon.
Advertisement

“I can’t say when it will be wrapped up,” Wolters told The Times. “Over the past two years we have absolutely made progress in this investigation.

“We have new findings and new evidence. But there’s nothing that could prove in scientific terms, for example, that Madeleine is dead, such as traces of DNA or bone fragments.”
Christian Brückner was named as an official suspect in the case last month
Christian Brückner was named as an official suspect in the case last month
REX FEATURES

Instead the prosecutors plan to present Brückner’s defence lawyer with the evidence against him in five other cases — a prelude to filing charges — in the coming days.

These cases include the alleged rape of Hazel Behan, 39, an Irishwoman who has waived her right to anonymity to accuse Brückner of attacking her in 2004 while she was working as a tour rep in southern Portugal.
Sponsored

In another incident he is accused of lowering his trousers and masturbating in front of four children in the same region.

“In the other cases we are investigating, the investigations are in principle complete and over the next few days [Brückner’s] lawyer will be able to examine the files,” Wolters said. “I don’t know what the result will be. We will have to hear what his lawyer says. We need to wait and see the extent of the charges we will bring.”

At present Brückner is in the middle of a seven-year sentence in Oldenburg prison, 25 miles west of Bremen, for raping a 72-year-old American woman in the Algarve in 2005. His application for parole was denied by a local court several weeks ago.

The nature of the evidence connecting Brückner to Madeleine’s abduction remains unclear. A telecommunications mast is thought to have detected his mobile phone near the McCanns’ apartment at the time she disappeared from her bedroom.
Advertisement

This week Wolters declined to comment on a claim that an item linked to Madeleine had been found in the VW campervan Brückner had been living in during that period.

However, he said recent reports that threads from Madeleine’s pyjamas had been discovered in the van were “absolute rubbish”. “Those fibres we’re supposed to have found in the van: there weren’t any,” Wolters said.

She never mentioned the word fibres Peter, the ad hominem attacks that I'm seeing on twitter lead by McFadden and her gang are unjustifiable and asinine. One might disagree with her current stance on CB, but she has every right to pursue her own leads as a journalist, as we have every right to criticize or dismantle her investigation with facts. But to attack the person?

Last night the second part of Sandra's report and interview with Wolters was broadcast by CMTV. I felt it was far more interesting than the first part. Sandra put some tough questions to Wolters who continues to evade the questions behind a "can't comment". Both episodes have interesting bits of information, nevertheless like on her RTP reports, I think Sandra is pushing too strongly that CB is guilty, she's forcing the connection on very flimsy connections. It turns out she's working with a lady German journalist and has had access to the process here in Portugal, at least to parts of it from what I could gather. Going to record the video and upload it to youtube and then share it here. Will start working on the transcripts today, I was unable to start with that as I've been working on other things in my life.

sal wrote: ↑

Sat May 07, 2022 12:42 pm

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... y3XYX9fZ7I

Sandra Felgueiras doesn't need me defending her nor I am her mouth piece, nor do I have any ulterior motives when I call out an injustice when I see one, as was the case with the "fibres" fabrication that was wrongly attributed to Sandra, it's just my nature. I do not personally believe in her line of investigation. Even thought Brueckner is a sadistic s-e-x predator who deserves to rot in jail, I do not believe that he is the person behind Madeleine's disappearance or alleged murder. Nor do I think that her investigation has presented enough, if any evidence, in as much a TV program can present evidence that would prove Brueckner's guilt. Nevertheless I value her work, not only in the past but still now, as a journalist, even though we might not meet eye to eye in a number of issues beyond this case. Why is she important to this case? She has access to material the English and other foreign journalists don't have, we might not like her style nor the content she presents, but she does go after and pursue the leads she has.

xklamation

Just as predicted the story about the traces of fibres is total nonsense,' German Prosecutor believes he has new evidence, nearly all of it is in the public domain. But what remains consistent after 3 yrs of investigation is that the evidence he has is NOT enough to charge CB.

In a TV documentary aired on Tuesday night, Felgueiras asked German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters about the claims, the Mirror reports. He refused to confirm or deny whether evidence had been found in the van.

Felgueiras asked: “Is it true you did find something belonging to Madeleine in the caravan of Christian B?”

Wolters said: “I can’t comment on details of the investigation.”

Felgueiras added: “But you can’t deny it, can you?”

Mr Wolters replied: “I don’t want to deny it” — and qualified his statement later, adding “because the suspect has not yet been informed”.

honestbroker1 wrote: ↑

Mon May 09, 2022 11:51 am

I've been thinking about this documentary of Mark Williams-Thomas.

If, indeed, he has relevant information that would cast a different hue on the investigation, he shouldn't be announcing it to the world on national TV.

He should be sharing it with the relevant authorities, the Germans, Scotland Yard, the PJ, surely?

by Verdi Today at 16:03
I look forward to the day I never have to hear the name Christian Brueckner nor see his ugly mug ever again.

It has been reasonably proven that Christian Brueckner is not connected in any way with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann - in any way shape or form. Above all else, by the former Portuguese senior police officer Gonçalo Amaral who, I can say with confidence, is in a better position to investigate and comment on the allegations than any one else.

jjbd wrote: ↑

Mon May 09, 2022 4:29 pm

by Verdi Today at 16:03
I look forward to the day I never have to hear the name Christian Brueckner nor see his ugly mug ever again.

It has been reasonably proven that Christian Brueckner is not connected in any way with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann - in any way shape or form. Above all else, by the former Portuguese senior police officer Gonçalo Amaral who, I can say with confidence, is in a better position to investigate and comment on the allegations than any one else.

amaral was removed from the investigation in Oct 2007!

The archiving report did not support the interim report.

amaral produced photoshopped images of the van and Bruckner that have been proven to be incorrect.

So what position is amaral in to know anything at all about the German investigations?

Carlos Farinha recalled that Gonçalo Amaral left the PJ in 2008 and that "after that many people worked and work in the process ", regretting that the name continues to be related to the investigation.

by Verdi 04.02.17 15:45

I'm sure Mr Amaral is already in regular contact with ardent campaigners, such as CMoMM, PeterMac and Natasha Donn. As he is no longer employed by the Portuguese judiciary he can't work alone towards moving the case forward - outside help is free gratis and for nothing!